Remapping a College website’s navigation
Project Brief
We worked with a local technical training centre to redesign their website for more efficient navigation. Their marketing department was concerned that the school’s current website was difficult to understand and complained of a high drop-off rate, especially on the sign-up form.
ROLE
User Researcher
Information Architect
Content Strategist
Tools
Invision
Axure
Design Process
RESEARCH
Usability Testing with User
We conducted a series of usability testing alongside card sorting. We ran this study across 20 individuals from a range of backgrounds, including existing students and those who were likely to be interested in the college’s offerings. We also made sure to familiarise ourselves with the website and ran a content audit to understand its current organisation.
Problem
We found that users typically complained of difficulty in navigating the website, and that this stemmed from various sources.
One issue that frequently surfaced during usability testing was the frequent repetition of material - because the school offered many similar courses at various levels under different schemes, much of the course information was similar in content. This was further compounded by the jargon-heavy and unwieldy copy that users complained about. This made it difficult for them to understand what they were looking at and in identifying which programme was most suitable for them.
Similarly, during card sorting, we found that users understood the website’s terminology differently from the website’s intended meaning, and frequently ended up on the wrong pages, typically getting lost before quickly giving up.
On the site’s user interface, there was also a lack of salient visual hierarchy that made it difficult for users to easily distinguish between information groups or identify headers, links or Call-To-Action buttons. The site also utilised an inefficient navigation system where three of the navigation branches on the site's top navigation bar linked to the same sets of information. Users quickly became disoriented and felt a psychological information overload.
Prototyping and more research
Tree-testing Samples
Wireframing possible UIs
Based on this research, we rewrote the website’s information architecture in an attempt to create more efficiency in its organisation. We then ran a tree test using this new structure against another set of 10 users to determine if navigability had improved. We also wireframed possible UIs and tested a new prototype against another set of users with our proposed solutions to see if the time taken to accomplish the tasks laid out in the initial usability testing had improved. It did.
Solution
01; Redesigned Navigation
One of the biggest changes that we made to the site was rebuilding its information architecture from scratch towards one that was more learnable for users.
02; Content
Re-strategising
In response to comments that course information on the website carried too much lingo and was too difficult for laypersons to understand, we rewrote key descriptions and proposed explanatory subtitles wherever possible to aid in interpretation.
03; Progressive Disclosure
To tackle the oft-received complaint that the site’s overwhelming amount of information and the wide-range of similar-but-different course offerings, we designed a form that utilised progressive disclosure to help potential students identify the courses most relevant to them.